GetResponse vs MailChimp

Here is a comparison between Email Marketing Software products MailChimp & GetResponse.
The comparison details include features, reviews, ratings and pricing.

Product Name GetResponse MailChimp ConstantContact
Image
Editor's Rating

100%

90%

90%

Website Website Website Website
Price US$15/mo US$9.95/mo US$20/mo
Review Read Read Read
Good

Large number of templates, Landing page creator, List booster to build email list quickly.

Powerful API with plenty of integration, Industry’s leading email marketing tool, free account which allows to send 12000 emails per month and collect 2000 subscribers limit, Pay-as-you-go (Optional) pricing model.

Easy to use interface. Almost 20 years of experience. 400+ email templates to choose from and dedicated support on weekdays.

Bad

No pay-as-you-go plan.

No real-time reports, Require learning curve to understand the UI, No auto responder in free plan.

Imported templates are not guaranteed to look the same, free version only stores upto five images, no inbox preview, split A/B testing or trigger messaging capability.

Overall

GetResponse is assuredly an excellent option and a serious contender if you are looking to set up an email marketing service.

With free account and pay as you go plan option, MailChimp can be a really ideal solution for every online business who is just getting started or even have high volume senders

All in all, Constant Contact is user friendly and practical e-marketing solution with a varied selection of email templates. It is a great choice for new industry entrants and start-up firms alike.

Video
Email Marketing Service Features
Email Designer
Email Templates 500+ 450+ 400+
Form Templates 500+
Form Builder
Drag n Drop
Responsive Emails
Autoresponders
Time Based Delivery
Landing Pages
A/B Testing
Click Tracking
Analytics
Email Preview
Mobile Apps 2
Social Sharing
App Market 100+ 700+ 250+
Online Survey
Blog Newsletter
Manage Lists
Free Trial 30 Days Lifetime 60 Days
Support Options 5 3 2
Quick Overview
Market Strength 93 97 94
Feature Strength 95 92 87