ConstantContact vs MailChimp

Here is a comparison between Email Marketing Software products MailChimp & ConstantContact.
The comparison details include features, reviews, ratings and pricing.

Product Name ConstantContact MailChimp GetResponse
Image
Editor's Rating

90%

90%

100%

Website Website Website Website
Price US$20/mo US$9.95/mo US$15/mo
Review Read Read Read
Good

Easy to use interface. Almost 20 years of experience. 400+ email templates to choose from and dedicated support on weekdays.

Powerful API with plenty of integration, Industry’s leading email marketing tool, free account which allows to send 12000 emails per month and collect 2000 subscribers limit, Pay-as-you-go (Optional) pricing model.

Large number of templates, Landing page creator, List booster to build email list quickly.

Bad

Imported templates are not guaranteed to look the same, free version only stores upto five images, no inbox preview, split A/B testing or trigger messaging capability.

No real-time reports, Require learning curve to understand the UI, No auto responder in free plan.

No pay-as-you-go plan.

Overall

All in all, Constant Contact is user friendly and practical e-marketing solution with a varied selection of email templates. It is a great choice for new industry entrants and start-up firms alike.

With free account and pay as you go plan option, MailChimp can be a really ideal solution for every online business who is just getting started or even have high volume senders

GetResponse is assuredly an excellent option and a serious contender if you are looking to set up an email marketing service.

Video
Email Marketing Service Features
Email Designer
Email Templates 400+ 450+ 500+
Form Templates 500+
Form Builder
Drag n Drop
Responsive Emails
Autoresponders
Time Based Delivery
Landing Pages
A/B Testing
Click Tracking
Analytics
Email Preview
Mobile Apps 2
Social Sharing
App Market 250+ 700+ 100+
Online Survey
Blog Newsletter
Manage Lists
Free Trial 60 Days Lifetime 30 Days
Support Options 2 3 5
Quick Overview
Market Strength 94 97 93
Feature Strength 87 92 95